buongiornodaisy: (Default)
Frankie ([personal profile] buongiornodaisy) wrote in [community profile] om_nom 2009-05-06 11:49 pm (UTC)

So, it would be fine to criticize LJ about it if they didn't mention Dreamwidth? Because otherwise they come off as DW partisans or something?

Honestly? Yes. The Dreamwidth/fandom migration issue is such a hot topic right now that someone who reads this complaint could read it as another attempt to pimp out Dreamwidth, when they're already tired of all the other posts explaining why they should move to Dreamwidth or what they perceive to be methods to strong-arm them into joining Dreamwidth (i.e., linking them to locked posts over here). That besides, I personally don't see this as an issue with LiveJournal so much as I see it with an ad service that's been gamed by NOM, who's really the culprit here: not a website that didn't even know the ad was up in the first place.

Post a comment in response:

From:
Anonymous( )Anonymous This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID( )OpenID You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address. Sign in using OpenID.
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.